Association between left atrial low-voltage area and induction and recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between induction and recurrence due to atrial tachycardia (AT) and left atrial (LA) matrix progression after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation and achieved sinus rhythm before the procedure were classified into three groups according to the AT pattern induced after the procedure: group N (non-induced), F (focal pattern), and M (macroreentrant pattern) in 3D mapping. RESULTS: The total rate of AT induction was 19.7% (30/152) in groups F (n = 13) and M (n = 17). Patients in group M were older than those in groups N and F, with higher CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc values, left atrial enlargement, and low-voltage area (LVA) size of LA. The receiver operating characteristic curve determined that the cut-off LVA for macroreentrant AT induction was 8.8 cm2 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.97). The recurrence of AT at 36 months in group N was 4.1% (5/122), and at the second ablation, all patients had macroreentrant AT. Patients with AT recurrence in group N had a wide LVA at the first ablation, and the cut-off LVA for AT recurrence was 6.5 cm2 (AUC 0.94, 95%CI 0.88-0.99). Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that only LVA size was associated with the recurrence of macroreentrant AT (odds ratio 1.21, 95%CI 1.04-1.51). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to develop a therapeutic strategy based on the LVA size to suppress the recurrence of AT in these patients.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes for Deferred Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements.

The midterm prognosis of patients with deferred revascularization based on resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not well established. We investigated the midterm clinical outcomes of 137 consecutive patients with deferred revascularization of 177 coronary arteries based on RFR and FFR. Patients were classified into 3 groups (concordant normal, concordant abnormal, discordant FFR and RFR), using known cutoffs for FFR (≤0.80) and RFR (≤0.89). All-cause mortality occurred in 9 (6.6%) and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in 16 patients (11.7%). Concordant abnormal, age, body mass index (BMI), and current or history of cancer were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality. In a multivariable model, current or history of cancer was significantly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 6.8, p = 0.02). Concordant abnormal, current or history of cancer, BMI, and left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with increased risk of MACE, and all predictors correlated significantly with MACE (abnormal concordance: HR 4.2, p = 0.043; current or history of cancer: HR 4.0, p = 0.047; BMI: HR 0.8, p = 0.020; left ventricular ejection fraction: HR 0.9, p = 0.017). Although these results support performing percutaneous coronary intervention according to evidence-based RFR or FFR thresholds, deferred lesions with discordant FFR and RFR results were not associated with worse prognosis.

Relationship between resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve in assessments of coronary stenosis severity.

AIM: Comparisons between the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), a new physiological resting index, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in terms of prognostic value are limited. We aimed to identify the prognostic value of concordance between RFR and FFR and to determine the stability of measured RFR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured FFR and RFR in 161 coronary arteries of 119 patients and classified the data using known cutoffs for FFR (≤0.80) and RFR (≤0.89) into groups; high FFR and high RFR (high FFR/low RFR) group, high FFR and low RFR (high FFR/low RFR) group, low FFR and high RFR (low FFR/high RFR) group, and low FFR and low RFR (low FFR/low RFR) group. The concordance rates in these groups were 42.2% (68/161), 4.4% (7/161), 14.3% (23/161), and 39.1% (63/161), respectively. The concordance between FFR and RFR was 81.4%. The prevalence of females was significantly higher, values for hemoglobin values were significantly lower, and average E/E' (an index of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function by echocardiography) was significantly higher in high FFR/low RFR group than in low FFR/high RFR group (p = .008, .050, and .028, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The RFR and FFR values consistently agreed. Female, anemia, and LV diastolic dysfunction may be related to the difference of discordance between high FFR/low RFR and low FFR/high RFR.

Evaluation of glucose tolerance, post-prandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia influencing the incidence of coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the frequency of patients who have glucose intolerance has been increasing in Japan. Glucose intolerance and insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia are thought to influence the progression of atherosclerosis. The present study examined glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, post-prandial hyperglycemia/hyperinsulinemia and coronary risk factors by using 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Coronary risk factors were examined and OGTT with measurement of plasma glucose and serum insulin was done to evaluate the glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in 263 patients who underwent coronary angiography; 202 subjects were diagnosed as having coronary heart disease (CHD) and 61 subjects were normal. We compared the two groups. RESULTS: The rate of having diabetes was significantly high in the CHD group. From the result of OGTT, 22.3% of CHD patients had diabetes mellitus and 36.6% had impaired glucose tolerance, thus the total glucose intolerance rate was 57.7% in the CHD group. No significant difference was noted in the homeostatic model assessment-R (HOMA-R), but glucose and insulin at 2 hours after OGTT were all significantly high in the CHD group. CONCLUSION: The rate of glucose intolerance and the levels of post-prandial glucose and insulin were high in the CHD group. We concluded that the post-prandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia influenced the incidence of CHD.